Imperium Watch: The Sludgepit Legacy

Ecuadorians seek redress for pollution by an oil company.

Comments (1)
Thursday, July 09, 2009

As protests in Peru quiet down after its legislature revoked trade rules that would have opened the way for logging and mining in the high Amazon country (see Imperium Watch, July 2, 2009), a suit leveled against Texaco-Chevron for polluting air, soil and water in Ecuador is back in the news. The suit, first brought in 1993, is expected to conclude this year. With $27 billion at stake, it's said to be the largest environmental battle in history.

Photos of sludge pits in the area are abundant; in fact, both sides agree that the region is grossly polluted—so polluted that local people charge that the fouling of water and air has caused thousands of deaths from cancer and other diseases. But Chevron says the national oil company Petroecuador, which itself has a dismal environmental record, is responsible for the pollution. The poisoning of air and water here are believed to be among the reasons Peruvians have resisted the prospect of having their Amazon region similarly dirtied.

Chevron did its credibility no service by hiring a company connected to one of its own directors and investors, Samuel Armacost, to examine the cancer claims. A resulting study claimed the numbers of cancer cases put forward by the plaintiffs were high. But when New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo began investigating whether Chevron had given its shareholders timely notification of the potential liability it faced, Armacost's conflict of interest was revealed, together with the fact that the study had only counted cases backed by death certificates, though such documentation is rare among the indigenous cultures in that part of Ecuador.

Former EPA scientist Douglas Beltman, a consultant to the Ecuadorian plaintiffs, told Reuters News Service late in May that the study was "conducted to further the interests of Chevron rather than to better understand the health problems faced by the people."

Reportedly, Mickey Kantor, a former U.S. trade representative, and Clinton White House chief of staff Mack McLarty have been lobbying the Obama administration to rescind Ecuador's right to export products to the U.S. duty-free in order to pressure the Ecuadorian government to withdraw support for the plaintiffs. The case shows that it's not only in the Middle East that our drive to corner oil has skewed our foreign policy.

Comments (1)
Post a Comment
Should the claim by the Ecuadorean People and/or the indigeneous people from Peru, be a bonifide one, then the oil companies that created such a gross polution should cure and/or pay for their lack of consideration towards other people and other part of the world. Moreover, the oil and mining companies going around the globe in their quest for the black or yellow gold failed to see that the planet is only one and it does not matter where they create poluttion, it will always come back to hunt us.
Posted by Victor R Florian on 7.8.09 at 13:39



New User/Guest?

Find it Here:
search type:
search in:

« Previous   |   Next »
Print Email RSS feed

From Our Readers
Baker: More of the Same; Props to Rohmann; Props to Rohmann
Between the Lines: A Gun Owner’s Resentment
Why make it expensive and difficult for law-abiding residents to possess firearms?
Sorry, Nixon
If the impeachment of our 37th president showed that the system works, what does Obama’s continued political survival say about it?
The Zipcar Is Here
Car sharing takes hold in the Valley.
Under the Microscope
Did ex-WSU president Evan Dobelle use university resources to support an identity as well as a lifestyle?
From Our Readers
Casino Opposition “Selfish”; Cut Foreign Aid, Not Our Military
Between the Lines: Deval’s Capital Management
He can rehab his office, but what about his legacy?
From Snowden to the Pentagon Papers
Can student interest in civics be rekindled?