News

The World This Week: American Terrorists

You're more likely to be blown away by a fellow American than by a terrorist from the more exotic parts of the world.

Comments (19)
Thursday, April 16, 2009

Terrorism begins at home. Long before 9/11 occurred, America was rocked by the occasional wave of domestic terrorist violence, from Columbine High School to the Oklahoma City bombing. Our history—like that of all countries—is littered with the bodies of people killed as "collateral damage" to some "higher" ideology or government policy. Slavery, it could be argued, was a form of terrorism, as was the slaughter and forced relocation of Native Americans. And so on.

Lately we seem to be following in that tradition with a vengeance as we've been rocked by a flurry of waves from our homegrown "suicide bombers." Ours don't strap explosives to their bodies and walk into crowds. They simply arm themselves to the teeth with an arsenal of "legal" weaponry and walk into crowds and start shooting until someone shoots them or they turn the guns on themselves.

For every news story that begins, "an Iraqi insurgent walked into a ____ (fill in the blank with market, mosque, restaurant, newsstand, train station) "and detonated the bomb...", we've had one that begins, "A lone gunman entered a _____ (fill in the blank with church, nursing home, trailer park, mall, high school, counseling service, city hall, courtroom) "and began shooting."

In the past two weeks, we've witnessed one man entering a nursing home in North Carolina, exercising his "right to bear arms" as "guaranteed by the Second Amendment" by seeking out his wife. Not gaining the satisfaction of finding her, he killed seven residents (one old lady aged 98) and a nurse and then wounded a cop before being subdued like a rogue elephant. Another man in Pittsburgh, railing against "the Zionists controlling the media," believed Obama was going to take away his "right to bear arms" (specifically assault rifles) and gunned down three police officers. A man in Alabama exercised his Second Amendment rights by killing 10 people, including family members, before shooting himself. Another man in Washington took revenge on his wife by entering his trailer and shooting all five of their children. Then he shot himself.

A new list of similarly violent and depraved acts could be compiled next month or the month after that, but it does seem like we are in the middle of a freakish patch. Some might blame the poor economy; others might point to our Greek chorus of right-wing pundits whipping up the hate. Or, as a British paper put it after the Pittsburgh shootings, "The killer's views echo the increasingly violent and apocalyptic tone taken by some conservative commentators to a changing America on conservative radio and television networks, where they believe the Obama administration are a bunch of communists and socialists waiting to destroy America internally." I don't subscribe to the latter view; right-wing idiots are always whipping up the hate, in good times and bad.

Here's a clue: April 16 is the second anniversary of the largest mass shooting in U.S. history, when a Virginia Tech University student killed 32 before killing himself. Right after that event, there was talk of closing the "gun show loophole"—the rule that, insanely, lets any adult buy guns from dealers at gun shows with no background checks.

An ABC-TV affiliate in Virginia, commendably, decided to test the loophole last week. They sent Omar Samaha, whose sister was one of the Virginia Tech victims, to a Richmond gun show with $5,000. Samaha was able to buy ten guns in less than an hour, including three assault rifles, four shotguns and a Glock pistol like the one that killed his sister.

As he said, "I don't want to think about how gruesome it was and how somebody used this type of weapon on my sister and so many innocent people. It's devastating."

Samaha did not have to fill out background checks or even show any legal form of identification. Show them the money in America and you can get your hands on an arsenal of "legal" weaponry within an hour in 33 different states. Expect more carnage.

Comments (19)
Post a Comment
If you want to find out what really happened at Columbine I suggest you read what the eyewitnesses had to say: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/columbineeight.php
Posted by starviego on 4.14.09 at 11:40
Without commenting on the rest of this article, it should be pointed out that the following statement is incorrect: "...the "gun show loophole"the rule that, insanely, lets any adult buy guns from dealers at gun shows with no background checks." It is not legal, anywhere in the US (including Virginia), for any dealer to sell a firearm to anyone without a background check. This applies at a store, on the Internet, and a gun show, in fact, anywhere. Private sales, ie, sales between indivicuals, not dealers, are not prohibited by federal statute, though some states do regulate or prohibit private sales. Since prohibitions of private sales impact people far beyond "gun shows", it is important to draw the distinction.
Posted by nitpicker on 4.14.09 at 16:50
Don't confuse these morons with facts. They don't fit their agenda. Just Just drink the koolaid and repeat, Guns BAD Guns BAD Guns BAD Guns BAD
Posted by Kevin on 4.14.09 at 17:17
You can't even get the information in the article correct, you are so hysterical. Get a life. Learn to use a gun if you can pass the background check. Bad guys don't bother with the background check thingy just like they would not obey the law that bans guns. Come to think of it, didn't McVey use fertilizer to blow up that building in Oklahoma? Fertilizer is dangerous, you know. You should demand it be banned! We have the right - the second amendment - to own guns. Get used to it.
Posted by Sara on 4.14.09 at 17:56
I am continually amazed at the volume of outright lies spewed by gun control advocates about gun laws or guns in general (i.e. "cop killer" bullets, plastic GLOCKS) and here we see the lie than people can buy guns from dealers at gun shows thanks to this "loophole." How can people and groups that advocate for more gun control expect to have an honest debate when they lie lie lie lie lie? I am beginning now to actually believe that they don't want an honest debate but ultimately a flat-out gun ban. I used to dismiss this theory as somewhat paranoid because I personally know several otherwise reasonable people who like the idea of more gun control, but it seems that not a day goes by where you don't read an editorial or press release that doesn't contain at least one flagrant lie about guns.
Posted by Ben Miner on 4.15.09 at 5:11
The gun show loophole is a fact. You just can't bring yourself to admit that people in 33 states can buy guns (including assault rifles, shotguns, Glocks, etc.) without a background check. Just hand over the cash and you get your gun. Where's the "lie" in that? The lies are perpetuated by so called "gun advocates". What do you suggest we do to keep these violent mass shootings from happening? Be nicer to the killers? Give them more guns, to make them feel better about themselves?
Posted by sniper on 4.15.09 at 20:52
Kevin, Sara, Ben. You seem to be as bad as what you are railing against. I don't what you say about gun show loopholes is true or not but based on your responses here, I wouldn't trust what you have to say. The one thing I can comment on in the column is the ABC segment. I saw the guy and I saw the guns he bought. He bought two assault rifles, a shotgun and two handguns in less than an hour, with cash, at a gun show in Richmond. Five guns purchased from five different dealers. Not one of them asked for a piece of identification or had him fill out forms for a background check. That may or may not fulfill your definition of a "loophole," but it seems plenty fucked up to me.
Posted by Chris on 4.15.09 at 21:45
I agree with the one post that says bad guys will never follow the rules. Banning certain types of guns or whatever will have absolutely zero effect the type of gun crime that we see around here( mostly gang related). They buy guns on the street. They don't care about the rules. Overregulation will only hinder legal gun owners. Which are hunters and collectors.
Posted by kevthedev on 4.16.09 at 7:24
I agree with the one post that says bad guys will never follow the rules. Banning certain types of guns or whatever will have absolutely zero effect the type of gun crime that we see around here( mostly gang related). They buy guns on the street. They don't care about the rules. Overregulation will only hinder legal gun owners. Which are hunters and collectors.
Posted by kevthedev on 4.16.09 at 7:24
No no no. We must ban guns and create more gun-free zones in order to stop all of this violence. Virginia Tech was a gun free campus and clearly that helped avoid.... oh no, wait. The only way to stop this mass shooting trend is for more rights for good and responsible citizens to carry. All evidence points to this fact but it falls on deaf ears with the anti-gun crowd. The reality is this: Mass shooters usually intend on committing suicide and figure: why not go out in a blaze of glory and make other people suffer too? Unfortunately our ridiculous gun laws make it possible for such a person to go into a school or mall or office or wherever and they know they will be untouched for a while before cops show up. (and by the way, when cops show up they also have the natural instinct to protect their own lives to an extent and typically wait outside the locked doors until it's over - ala the VT shooting. So that means the shooter can basically go sick until he/she runs out of ammo. ) "Gun Free" zones are perfect if you are looking to do something like that. Now, if there is a carry and conceal law then you can't know who is or isn't carrying, so the mass shooting scenario above becomes less attractive. For all you know, you could get taken out as soon as you walk through the door with your duffle bag. That will reduce it some. For those that still do it, armed responsible citizens can reduce the casualties. Instead of 30 people, maybe it's 2 or 3 before someone is able to stop the killer. Gun in hand is better than a cop on the phone. Outlaw guns and only outlaws will have them. These are cliche but VERY true sayings. The bottom line is that it's ultimately our responsibility as citizens to defend ourselves. Cops are not much help in these situations (through no fault of their own). They can just fill out the reports afterward. The problem is that many anti-gun folks simply don't want the responsibility of owning a fire arm and assume others can't handle it either. We want to (myself included) live our lives without worry, with the naive belief that the police officer will be there to help us. People don't commit mass murder because guns were handy. They obtain guns by any means necessary in order to commit mass murder. There were no mass shootings in the wild west. *Disclaimer: I don't suggest we should go back to the wild west days and reference was only included to illustrate a point. That being said, if everyone theoretically had a gun on their hip, one could argue that there would be more civility (or at least respect) between people in everyday life.
Posted by Joe on 4.16.09 at 10:13
Don't forget the murderous crimes admittedly committed by Bill Ayers, who is Obama's buddy. Should we blame the guns/bombs, or blame the person?
Posted by Dave on 4.16.09 at 11:48
"There were no mass shootings in the wild west." The natives might quibble with your grasp of history, Joe.
Posted by Mark Roessler on 4.16.09 at 16:33
Joe, do you know what it's like to have a friend or family member killed by someone using a gun? Didn't think so. Your kneejerk hysteria about "gun free zones" and "gun free campuses" only illustrates the inability of gun lovers to have a serious discussion about this very deadly issue. ALL campuses are "gun free," so to throw that out is just plain misdirected and willfully obtuse. All shopping malls are "gun free". All churches are "gun free." All high schools and sports stadiums and libraries and airports are gun free. THAT IS NOT THE POINT. You leap from that to suggesting that everyone carry guns. This can't be a serious answer, or even a solution that's worthy of a society that is sane. I'll never get over the damage that was done to my life by someone with a gun.
Posted by Black on 4.16.09 at 22:15
Black - 1. I never suggested that everyone "should" carry guns. 2. I made my point quite clearly. All of those "gun-free" zones are precisely where many of these mass shootings take place. Think about it. I'm sorry to hear about your loss but it doesn't make your opinion any more valuable than mine on this subject. Guns are not the enemy, violent people are.
Posted by Joe on 4.17.09 at 5:22
Joe, here's what you wrote: "That being said, if everyone theoretically had a gun on their hip, one could argue that there would be more civility (or at least respect) between people in everyday life." That sounds like you are suggesting that everyone carry guns. Unless everything you say is "theoretical," in which case it is useless. Your "theoretically" is just semantics. It's covering your ass, in case your "theory" doesn't pan out.
Posted by Black on 4.18.09 at 8:32
A Maryland man believed to have shot and stabbed his wife and three young children to death before killing himself with a shotgun was having money problems and left a note saying he suffered from "psychological issues," authorities said. Christopher Wood, 34, may have slashed at least some of his family members in the killings and used a small-caliber handgun on others, Frederick County Sheriff Charles Jenkins said. He was found dead of an apparently self-inflicted shotgun wound at the foot of the bed where the bodies of his wife and 2-year-old daughter lay, the sheriff said. Wood's sons were 5 and 4 years old, authorities said. His wife, Francie Billotti Wood, was 33. The boys were found in their beds in a single bedroom, the sheriff said. Authorities did not release the names of the children. "These are horrific incidents," said Jenkins, who said he couldn't remember another homicide in the past 20 years in Middletown, a one-stoplight town northwest of Baltimore. "No one should ever have to be exposed to this."
Posted by Terry on 4.19.09 at 15:55
Mark Roessler - Picture an old time saloon and you will understand my example better. Black - I think more law abiding citizens should carry guns -not necessarily everyone. I was proactively tackling the slippery slope argument. And yes, I think school faculty members should be allowed to carry. This would eliminate the fish-in-a-barrel characteristic of college campuses for would-be mass shooters.
Posted by Joe on 4.20.09 at 12:08
Left-winger Alan Bisbort claims that it's always right-wingers whipping up hate. Guess he's never listened to Air America Radio (at least Randi Rhodes got fired for calling Hillary Clinton a "f---ing whore").
Posted by Tim on 4.20.09 at 18:16
Terrorists? Youre kidding right? Sorry, an idiot(s) who goes on a rampage and kills kids at VA tech is a NUT, not a terrorist. Learn the diff. Oh wait, hold on, heres some Kool-aid. liberal freaks abound in this valley. The answer for them is BAN EVERYTHING, (except pot) and everything will be ok. Wrap your kids in bubblewrap, case jr.. scrapes a knee on his skate board. ENOUGH. Thanks to the writer of this article we can now tap another nail into the coffin of COMMONSENSE. We are mourning the loss of a beloved old friend who recently passed away. His name was Common Sense. Common Sense lived a long life but died in the United States from a vicious contagious disease. He selflessly devoted his life to service in schools, hospitals, homes and factories, helping folks get the jobs done without fanfare and foolishness. For decades, petty rules, frivolous lawsuits, and ludicrous verdicts held no power over Common Sense. He was credited with cultivating such valued lessons as to know when to come in from the rain, why the early bird gets the worm, and that life isn't always fair. Common Sense lived by a simple and sound financial policy. Don't spend more than you earn. Common Sense also lived by other time-tested strategies like: The adults are in charge and not the kids, and it's okay to come in second or third. A veteran of the Great Depression and the Technological Revolution, Common Sense survived cultural and educational trends such as body piercing, 'whole language' and 'new math'. But his health declined when he became infected with the I'm not responsible for my own actions and It's alright if it feels good viruses. He watched in pain as good people became ruled by self-seeking lawyers. His health rapidly deteriorated when schools endlessly implemented zero-tolerance policies. Reports of a six-year-old boy charged with sexual harassment for kissing a classmate and a teacher fired for reprimanding an unruly student only worsened his condition. It declined further when schools had to get parental consent to administer aspirin to a student, but could not inform the parents and get their permission when their children were given mind-altering drugs or birth control pills; and when universities turned into cesspools of debauchery and socialist propaganda. Common Sense lost his will to live when criminals received better treatment than their victims, the Ten Commandments became contraband, and priests molested young boys. When a woman failed to realize that a steaming cup of coffee is hot, and was awarded a huge settlement; and when the president sold security related technology to a hostile nation, Common Sense fell into a coma. As the end neared, Common Sense drifted in and out of consciousness, but was kept informed of new questionable regulations, such as thought control and partial birth abortion. Finally, when another president, claiming to staunchly protect the country from terrorist atrocities, yet allowing the same villains to invade the country through borders that are strangely very penetrable; being fully aware of what the grave consequences of such deliberate and ominous neglect can be, Common Sense died of sudden cardiac arrest. Common Sense was preceded in death by his parents, Truth and Trust, his wife, Love; his daughter, Responsibility; and his sons, Diligence and Reason. He is survived by three stepbrothers, Deception, Greed and Ignorance. Not many attended his funeral, because so few noticed he was gone.
Posted by whocares on 4.25.09 at 19:58
Comment:

Name:

Password:

New User/Guest?

Find it Here:
keyword:
search type:
search in:

« Previous   |   Next »
Print Email RSS feed

Pro-Choice Choices
Imperium Watch: Let's Get Back to Making Things
We let our manufacturing sector dry up at our peril.
American Catechism
Andrew Bacevich's Washington Rules examines American orthodoxy and global warfare
Voters, Fasten Your Seatbelts
Jill Stein is finally in the gubernatorial debates--and she's got a lot to say.
Down to the Wire
Between the Lines: Changes
A note from the editor
Letters: What Do You Think?
This week: No Contest in D.A.'s Race; No Free Lunch; Greenfield Needs Facts, Not Opinion; Of BP and Vermont Yankee; and Letter About Letters
Success for Story's Bill for New Mothers