Imperium Watch: Make Bush's Day

Congress may give the president a pretext for warlike acts against Iran.

Comments (2)
Thursday, July 03, 2008

In spite of a National Intelligence Estimate from last December that found that Iran had halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003, Congress may soon give President Bush a weapon to use to strike at Iran—and claim that he is simply enforcing the wishes of Congress.

A resolution, H Con 362, is gathering momentum in the U.S. House and has a counterpart in the Senate. It calls for a crackdown on Iran by "prohibiting the export to Iran of all refined petroleum products; imposing stringent inspection requirements on all persons, vehicles, ships, planes, trains, and cargo entering or departing Iran; and prohibiting the international movement of all Iranian officials not involved in negotiating the suspension of Iran's nuclear program."

Inspect persons and vehicles entering or departing Iran? Prohibit the international movement of Iranian officials?

How could this be enforced without a blockade or military action? That's what observers who want to avoid war with Iran are asking. It's widely believed that President Bush has ordered preparations to be made for a military strike against Iran and has been restrained by the extreme reluctance of many Pentagon officials to take on another military action in the Middle East.

"I'm all for stricter sanctions against Iran, but the blockade part goes too far," U.S. Rep. Barney Frank, who originally supported the resolution, told the Advocate. "I'm going to call the sponsors and tell them I'm changing my vote."

The resolution highlights the wrenching question of how far the U.S. will go to support Israel's real or perceived security needs. It was pushed in Congress by AIPAC (American Israeli Public Affairs Committee), the powerful pro-Israeli lobby.

In fact, as the resolution gathers steam in Congress, two former officials of AIPAC who in 2005 were indicted for spying—illegally passing classified American defense information to Israeli journalists and reporters— are still awaiting trial.

Meanwhile Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice reportedly wants to set up a sub-embassy-level diplomatic station in Tehran to process visas and relay messages from the U.S. to the Iranian government.

Comments (2)
Post a Comment
Thank you Stephanie for that report. That Barney Frank is withdrawing his support is very, very good news, if that is part of a trend. I think the reason for Frank's decision is just good politics... now that this resolution is becoming infamous, Frank may see it as too costly from a political standpoint to continue to support it... We hope others follow his lead. So we need to redouble our efforts to get the word out on this resolution and its implications. There are still people who are not aware of this, there are still people who need to contact their congresspeople, who need to tell their friends. We at are working hard to stop the war agenda of aipac and work for a policy of peace based on international law and for human rights for all. We hope more can join us in this fight.
Posted by Jim Harris on 7.4.08 at 11:46
Great article. I hope Advocate readers join with more than 500,000 people who signed an online petition to stop the next war at http://StopWarOn Ms. Kraft's timely report certainly demonstrates the need for urgent action.
Posted by Catherine Donaghy on 7.11.08 at 10:26



New User/Guest?

Find it Here:
search type:
search in:

« Previous   |   Next »
Print Email RSS feed

Better Later?
More joining the ranks in favor of a later start time for high schools
Between the Lines: Riding the Brand
Martha Coakley and Charlie Baker are more afraid to lose than inspired to win.
More Than A Coal Job
A veteran of the Mount Tom energy plant begins again.
From Our Readers
In Satoshi We Trust?
Outside the Cage
How solid is the case for organic and cage-free egg production?
Between the Lines: Practically Organic
Does the organic farming movement make perfect the enemy of good?
Scene Here: The Kitchen Garden Farm