Off the Air: The News Behind the News

A change of ownership kicks off a storm of controversy at Channel 40.

Comments (11)
Thursday, December 20, 2007

When news broke earlier this year that WGGB, the ABC television affiliate based in Springfield, was being sold, employees say the reaction around the station was generally positive.

WGGB had been owned by Sinclair Broadcasting, a Maryland-based corporation with more than 50 TV stations in 35 markets. While officials from the labor union that represents 68 employees at WGGB say they had a good relationship with the local station management, the parent corporation's politically conservative bent and focus on the bottom line (which included the shuttering of news and weather departments in other markets) sometimes led to frayed nerves at the station. Employees say they were particularly happy to see that the new owner was local: John Gormally, publisher of BusinessWest, a regional business journal.

The honeymoon was short-lived. Within a few weeks of officially taking ownership of the station on Nov. 1, Gormally laid off a number of employees (the union says 10; Gormally told the Springfield Republican it was only six) and demoted several others. Of the affected employees, several were very active in the union, according to the National Association of Broadcast Employees and Technicians Local 19. Although the union had a contract with Sinclair that extended to next fall, Gormally is not bound to honor that contract under the particular structure of the sale.

While Local 19 has begun negotiations with Gormally for a new contract, until and unless one is reached, most employees at the station have virtually no job security or protections. Complicating matters are internal struggles among station employees over the role of the union, driven at least in part, it appears, by personality clashes.


To the outside observer, the conflict at WGGB carries the extra intrigue of local celebrity. The union stewards include on-air reporters Jim Cline and Jim Polito and weather forecaster Dan Brown, and Local 19's president is popular weatherman Tom Bevacqua.

Bevacqua was WGGB's chief meteorologist for years before leaving in 2006. While he now teaches and occasionally works as a substitute weatherman for rival station CBS Channel 3-Springfield, Bevacqua remains head of the union, a position he's held for more than a decade. In a recent interview, Bevacqua exuded the same cheerfulness he does on air. When he heard Gormally was buying the station, he says, he sent him an email congratulating him and wishing him well.

Local 19's relationship with management under Sinclair, Bevacqua said, was positive. "We've always been willing and able to work it out with management and employees," he said, and he had expected the same under the new owner. "I always think it's going to be a positive relationship because I'm a pretty positive person."

That optimism was quickly tested by the layoffs and demotions. Gormally did not respond to our interview requests. But according to sources at the station, the new owner has said he had to cut personnel costs to satisfy lenders who helped finance the $21. 2 million purchase. "He has a budget. He has to answer to his mortgagers, or whatever they're called," Bevacqua said. "I think he did what he thought was the right thing."

Still, the fact that so many of the affected employees were active in the union—the union's vice president, a long-time photographer, was among those laid off, and Cline and Brown were both demoted—has raised eyebrows. "I find it hard to believe that [Gormally] did not know that certain individuals who were either demoted or in fact were fired were members of the union," Bevacqua said. "But, hey, as I said, I'm a fairly positive person, so I'll give him the benefit of the doubt."

That benefit of the doubt, however, did not preclude the union filing several charges relating to the layoffs and demotions with the National Labor Relations Board.

While Gormally is not responding to reporters' calls, he did respond to an email sent to supporters of the pro-labor activist group Western Mass. Jobs with Justice last month. Jon Weissman, WMJWJ's chair, had copied Gormally in on the message, which bore the subject line "Union-busting at Channel 40?" In it, Weissman urged supporters to write protest letters to Gormally.

In reply to Weissman, Gormally wrote on the day after Thanksgiving: "Not union busting. Raised the minimum wage by $2 an hour, added extra holidays and vacation time for workers (while I am working today, the ABC40 staff has the day off, paid of course). Everything comes with time. Hope you understand."

"I will try to understand," Weissman replied, "but an employer with a union would set wages, holidays, and vacations through collective bargaining. Then, as a workers' rights advocate, I could use the settled contract as the measure of fairness (fairness to the employer, too)."

Gormally and the union have begun negotiating a new contract. At a meeting two weeks ago, the union put forth two proposals, said Bill Murray, a representative of NABET International. One of those included an interim contract that would last nine months, because, according to Murray, Gormally has said that he needs time to learn more about the broadcasting industry before settling on a long-term deal.

Bevacqua described the meeting as "fairly positive." The two sides are scheduled to meet again, possibly at the end of this week.

"We just want to protect our people," Bevacqua said. "By absolutely no means are we a union that's making outrageous demands. We're looking for Mr. Gormally to simply recognize and utilize the contract that was made with Sinclair until its expiration date, and then hopefully negotiate a new contract."

Meanwhile a second drama is playing out at WGGB, one that does not appear directly linked to the union's conflict with Gormally, but rather involves internal conflicts among station staff.

According to union representatives and station employees, a petition has been circulating around WGGB seeking to decertify the union. The petition drive apparently began last summer and was revived more recently, concurrently with the ownership change.

Sources identify Dave Madsen, WGGB's veteran news anchor, as a force behind the anti-union drive. But Madsen objected to the assertion, made by some union officials and reported in a recent Springfield Republican article, that he had initiated the petition drive. "I never initiated it," Madsen said in a voicemail to the Advocate.

Madsen declined to be interviewed. In an email he wrote: "I'm not going to get into a public finger pointing match with any union member or officer who is speaking with you. I just don't believe what really is an internal matter needs to be played out in the local press.

"Our owner is in negotiations with Local 19 and that's the only place any of these issues should be discussed," Madsen added.

Bevacqua said he's surprised that any employee would want to get rid of the union, given the recent firings and demotions. And, he added, Madsen—whom Bevacqua maintains has been involved in the petition effort—has an existing contract. "It's interesting he's trying to decertify the union when he's going to be protected anyway," Bevacqua said.

Murray said he's not worried about the risk of decertification; according to him, a majority of NABET members recently signed cards reaffirming their support of the union. Still, the effort, coming at a time of general insecurity, does nothing to help morale in the workplace, and seems to be worsening already tense relationships. It also makes Madsen appear, perhaps unfairly, to be carrying water for the new management.

"We were thrilled when Sinclair left and we were getting a local owner," Murray said last week. Ironically, he notes, the union was able to reach a workable agreement with Sinclair, a company that is not exactly beloved within the labor movement.

"We would like as good a deal as we got from [that] terrible company from Mr. Gormally," he said. "We want to build a good relationship, turn it around and get it successful for everyone."

Troubled as the early days of that relationship have been, Bevacqua says he's optimistic. "I have every reason to believe in the long run things will work out OK," he said.

Comments (11)
Post a Comment
It's just a matter of time before abc40 collapses underneath the weight of all the disagreements about the union, the extremely poor morale in the workplace, and Gormally's oddball, over-blown expectations that usually come out of left field... Cutting jobs is one thing...but trying to maintain ONE television station while ADDING another one with the same reduced staffing is not going to work...I'm surprised this article neglected to even mention the fact that Gormally has already made steps in the direction of starting a Fox affiliation within the same confines as abc40... It won't be long, as I said before, until abc40 just collapses...double the work-load by adding another television station onto one that has been going drastically downhill for the past few years makes absolutely NO sense what-so-ever.
Posted by Robert Longun on 12.20.07 at 10:59
I hope you do a follow up story on Jim Polito's firing and the 6 complaints lodged against gormally with the National Labor Relations board
Posted by Jason on 12.22.07 at 6:57
It is interesting to note that Mr. Gormally can fire and demote employees on one hand but on the other hand claim that he needs more time to learn about the business before he can enter into negotiations with the union. It's note the union's fault that he claims he is not familiar with the business. Doesn't this seem rather odd to you that someone who is apparently so successful with his other business ventures would be at a loss when it comes to TV media. I can't believe anyone with Mr. Gormally's supposed business acumen could make such a large business acquisition without first knowing ALL the you?
Posted by William Lillydale on 12.24.07 at 11:40
Firstly, Jim Cline is Vice President. The photog who was laid -off was the secretary-treasurer. Secondly, there is not a morale issue at the station. Third, Less than a month into owning the station Mr. Gormally gave raises to all part-timers which was around $2.50 extra an hour. Fourth, outsiders really should not be commenting on the internal state of mind of employees of the station.
Posted by Julie Maccarini on 1.10.08 at 4:35
To the poster above, Thanks for the clarification on Cline and the Treasurer. However, you are grossly wrong about the morale problem. Morale is at an all time low and it's not getting better anytime soon.
Posted by ABC40 Employee on 1.10.08 at 9:46
I work at ABC40 and morale is the best I have ever seen it. You can tell Gormally cares about the people he works with and is fighting to make their lives better. No one was demoted. That is simply not true. Moving reporters and photogs around to gain better ratings is part of the business. Only if their pay and benefits were reduced would it be a demotion, which I understand did not happen. It is not a coincidence that the only station in town with a union is the station with the lowest ratings.
Posted by ABC Worker on 1.21.08 at 6:16
I am posting under this name because it's a fact that morale is at an all time low. I never thought the day would come when we wished that Sinclair would buy back the station. Any behavior, comment or action that is not in lock step with the new owner is regarded as a threat and an act of disloyalty. Many employees chose to "go-along" by compromising their news, production, business or personal values for the sake of remaining in good graces with the new owner. For many their motivation is fear. There are others who make very healthy salaries and will do anything to keep their jobs by agreeing with everything, no matter how foolish. The problem is great ideas do not come from "yes" men and women. They come from those who challenge the status quo. Real leaders understand how to manage a diverse group of opinions before making decisions. No one has all the answers; just ask some of the most successful people, they'll tell you that diverse opinions and debate are the hallmark of any great organization. A leader who?s not insecure can motivate people and capitalize on their talents. There are many current employees whose abilities would be an asset to making 40 better. But, only if the new owner would encourage them to step up. I?m afraid that if he does not foster an environment of openness the station is doomed and that would be a tragedy for everyone, including the market. Blaming the Union for the station's low ratings is like saying a car that's painted yellow is slower than one that's red. Was it the Union who kept a mostly inept management team in place for the past decade? If a coach had that many losing seasons would they still be at the helm? Was it the Union that fired one of the few competent managers on November 1st and then replaced him with an incompetent manager who had to be fired two months later? Was it the Union that stripped every resource out of the building so that photographers had to beg, borrow and steal just to get the basics. Was it the Union that refused to do any market research to determine why the station's ratings have been on a downward slide for the past 14 years? Was it the Union that fired one of the most recognizable meteorologists in the market and replaced him with a Boston reject who has failed to make any impact in the ratings. Was it the Union who created a public relations nightmare by firing one of the station?s best reporters and then cancelled the UMass coaches show in the middle of the season? When did the Union ever stand in the way of getting more money for people? And by the way, everything we got from the Union was guaranteed by a contract. The new employee handbook states any benefit or work condition can be changed at any time. I'll bet the term "at will" employee means a lot to the 11 people who were tossed out on the street. Wake up folks. It's time for us to stand up for ourselves. Let me leave you with a quote that sums up the fear and disunity that will be the ruination of what could be a great station: In Germany they first came for the Communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me - and by that time no one was left to speak up.
Posted by News Watcher on 1.21.08 at 12:45
As a viewer of WGGB I do not believe that Gormally simply let individuals go with no for-thought of if these were union employees. I have been involved in (2) company take-overs in my years and both time was told that the new company would not be making changes until a time when they could better evaluate the needs of the company and the positions within. In both cases no sooner were the memos out then the initial lay-offs and job positions implemented. And again in both cases these layoffs involved strong union personnel. Ever since the union busting tactics started in the 1980s, and the mergers that left so many companies decimated and people on the street unemployed, we have been witnessing this practice of buying up, rounds of layoffs, scaring remaining workers into submission and the interoffice scabs who will gladly do the owners dirty work for that little extra attention.
Posted by Charles Ray on 1.24.08 at 4:06
Posted by mirc on 5.24.09 at 15:56
jordan shoes [url=]jordan shoes[/url]
Posted by zhuang on 8.19.09 at 17:48
Posted by zhuang on 8.19.09 at 17:51



New User/Guest?

Find it Here:
search type:
search in:

« Previous   |   Next »
Print Email RSS feed

In Satoshi We Trust?
Outside the Cage
How solid is the case for organic and cage-free egg production?
Between the Lines: Practically Organic
Does the organic farming movement make perfect the enemy of good?
Scene Here: The Kitchen Garden Farm
From Our Readers
Profiles in Survival
Young business owners in retail-rich Northampton get along by getting along.
The Burning Question
Neighbors of a proposed wood-burning plant in Springfield cry foul air