From Our Readers

Gun Control Compromise; Hated Gun Owners; Casino Fallacies

Comments (2)
Wednesday, September 03, 2014

Gun Control Compromise

I want to hunt. I attended my state-mandated hunter education course on April 16, over four months ago, and still haven’t received my license to purchase a firearm. Depending on when it finally arrives, I might miss goose hunting season altogether. So I empathize with the gripes Tom Vannah lists in his recent column (“A Gun Owner’s Resentment,” Aug. 28).

Yes, the state acutely needs to streamline the process for lawfully purchasing a firearm. But having held very ambivalent views toward gun control for years, I take issue with Vannah’s blanket condemnation of the recently passed state legislation, which deserves a nuanced response. The new law establishes a number of regulations that don’t infringe upon the rights of law-abiding citizens to purchase a gun: it authorizes licensed gun dealers to access criminal records, creates a state police gun-trafficking unit, and joins Massachusetts in the National Instant Background Check System.

While generally leaning in favor of the bill, I concur with Vannah’s thesis that the law might have been based on political expedience. I’ve asked a number of lawmakers how they voted on the final legislative package, and why. The most pointed was this response from a legislator: “How often do you get to vote ‘Yes’ for a bill that’s supported by both the Gun Owners Action League and [gun-control group] Moms Demand Action?”

In the current political environment, shouldn’t we be happy that laws are being crafted out of rarely found political compromise?


Hated Gun Owners

Gun control is not about crime and violence; this is about the systematic dismantling of a socially conservative voting bloc. The gun controllers see the Second Amendment as a rallying point for people who disagree with all the failed leftist policies that we’ve been saddled with the past several decades. The gun grabbers feel that, if they remove guns from the equation, they can fracture this voting bloc and thus usher in another round of morally bankrupt liberal social and economic policies.

Massachusetts gun owners need to understand that the gun control movement hates your guts. They want to neutralize you politically, stigmatize you socially, and isolate you culturally. They hate you because, as long as you have a gun in your hand, you are beholden to nobody. The thought of the freedom that is attendant to gun ownership terrorizes the gun grabbers. Don’t forget that.


Casino Fallacies

In response to the recent letter from Kathy Mullins of Chicopee concerning the possible casino in Springfield (“Casino Opposition ‘Selfish’,” Aug. 21) Mullins says she would “appreciate seeing letters from the people who live in Springfield so their voices can be heard... .” Mullins assumes everyone who lives in Springfield favors a casino. Nothing could be further from the truth. I live in Springfield and have been actively working against locating a casino here. I am not alone. Many who initially voted for the casino now realize what a mistake they are.

Mullins’ entire argument rests on the assumption that casinos further economic development. Again, nothing could be further from the truth. Casinos drain local economies by ruining local businesses, providing mostly lousy jobs to a few, and requiring huge outlays of money from local governments to provide for all the problems created: increased crime, lower property values, and domestic violence, to name a few. 

Comments (2)
Post a Comment

In response to 'Hated Gun Owners'....

"They hate you because, as long as you have a gun in your hand, you are beholden to nobody."

Really? Go walk into a police station with your gun in your hand and see who's beholden to who.

The left doesn't hate you because you're a gun owner. They hate you because people like you are dismantling the rule of ethical law and replacing it with the rule of violence and threats of violence.

Sensible gun laws, like waiting periods, background checks, etc. are not gun seizures. If you are a rational, responsible person, nobody's coming to take away your gun. So ramp down the hotheaded rhetoric and get a grip on reality.

According to your tribe's rhetoric, Obama is out to grab your guns, throw you into a FEMA camp, microchip you, and install Sharia law. If you're wondering why it hasn't happened yet, maybe you should wake up and realize it's because it's all a feverish figment of your imagination.

Posted by David Longey on 9.3.14 at 18:17
Touche. Solid arguments. Keep up the amazinng effort.
Posted by Wikipedia Info about China and Hong Kong on 10.1.14 at 19:16



New User/Guest?

Find it Here:
search type:
search in:

« Previous   |   Next »
Print Email RSS feed

In Satoshi We Trust?
Outside the Cage
How solid is the case for organic and cage-free egg production?
Between the Lines: Practically Organic
Does the organic farming movement make perfect the enemy of good?
Scene Here: The Kitchen Garden Farm
From Our Readers
Profiles in Survival
Young business owners in retail-rich Northampton get along by getting along.
The Burning Question
Neighbors of a proposed wood-burning plant in Springfield cry foul air