Guest Column: Springfield Needs a Police Commission

Comments (3)
Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Last week, Springfield mayor Domenic Sarno announced that he will appoint a new police commissioner from within the ranks of the Springfield Police Department. The announcement sparked controversy across the city. The larger issue is not whom he will appoint, but what the long-term result will be.

In 2009, the violent beating of a suspect, Melvin Jones, by then-Springfield police officer Jeffrey Asher (who was later tried and convicted for his crime) rekindled the fire in activists across the city, who demanded expanded oversight of the police department. Several groups and city councilors proposed returning to a five-member police commission, appointed by the mayor and confirmed by the City Council, to oversee administrative operations of the police department, including hiring, firing, investigating accusations of misconduct and determining disciplinary action.

While a police commission overseeing the SPD existed until roughly 2006, when it was dissolved by the Springfield Finance Control Board, the Sarno administration has held that, though this type of body could be created through a charter change with a vote from the City Council, to do so would violate the terms of Police Commissioner William Fitchett’s contract. Instead, Mayor Sarno created the Community Police Hearing Board. This body has met infrequently and has only the authority to deliver recommendations to the mayor and commissioner, with whom the final disciplinary decisions still rest.

Now, with the impending retirement of Commissioner Fitchett and the expiration of his contract, the door has been opened for the restoration of the police commission. Last month the issue was brought before the City Council and referred to committee, and seems to have wide support with seven Council sponsors.

For decades now the police department has suffered from a disconnect with the public and been distracted by scandals, accusations of misconduct and a perception of weakness. Some of this is deserved; some is not. A police commission will restore public trust in our police department while allowing the department itself to function more effectively. It will create a better environment for officers, who will have a body to appeal to when they feel they have been treated unfairly. Furthermore, the chief will be able to focus less on administrative matters and will be removed from the political process, allowing for independence and professionalism.

Public safety is a much-discussed issue in Springfield—some concerns exaggerated, some not—but the safety of the public will never improve if we continue the same practices that have failed us for the last decade and a half. Our system is broken, both for the public and for police officers, the vast majority of whom serve our city selflessly and with honor. We now have an opportunity to mend it. But should Mayor Sarno appoint a new police commissioner with a new contract, that opportunity will be jeopardized

We as a city must not allow this opportunity for change to pass. The police department is far too important to the success of Springfield. We must demand progress to move our city forward, to move beyond the distractions of our past and focus on the potential of our future.•

Jesse L. Lederman is an activist and organizer in Springfield, and a student at George Washington University in Washington, DC.


Comments (3)
Post a Comment

We have had police scandals in the past and we will in the future because they are “Civil Servants” who have become our untouchable masters, and if we revert back to the old Police Commission the chief will also be an untouchable “Civil Servant.” Anyone who thinks that appointment of a department head is non political is living in fantasy land.

The movement for the old police incompetent police commission are the same group who wanted ward representation so that the city council would he a racially diverse body. As we have seen by the most unimpressive results, racial diversity does not necessarily mean competence.

The old Police Commission provided a good excuse for the mayor and the City Council to avoid all blame as the incidents piled up. The members were buy and large rubber stamps. Their terms were staggered, so no mayor could do much to change the police department even if he wanted to. The City Council had to confirm the appointments. If they did not agree with the replacement, the person was not replaced. The police commission was apart time job. That means the “Civil Servants” who run the department can spend their day circumventing what is nominally the civilian control.

I once had to turn around because a couple of cops were blocking the road with their cruiser reading a newspaper. I received a letter from Commissioner Keating saying that proper police procedures were followed. This is the type of response we can expect from the old style police commission. If police did not want to enforce laws against certain people, the 5 rubber stamps would not make them.

Fitchet may not be perfect, but from reading the news it appears he has fired and disciplined more cops for wrong doing than any chief or police commission that I can remember. I like the idea of blaming the mayor who in theory can be replaced, and his appointed Commissioner, better than a Chief of Police for life with five people from the low end of the bell curve accepting his excuses every week.

Posted by Robert Underwood on 1.23.14 at 8:15

The more accountability that can be built into our system of policing, the better off we, and the officers that serve us, will be. Right now, being the police commissioner is linked contractually with the lack of a police commission! Why should oversight be seen as something not to be desired?

Posted by michaelann bewsee on 1.26.14 at 8:34

I like oversight. But with the old style police commssion we did not get it. They were rubber stamps, and they will be if it is revised.

Posted by Robert Underwood on 1.26.14 at 15:35



New User/Guest?

Find it Here:
search type:
search in:

« Previous   |   Next »
Print Email RSS feed

In Satoshi We Trust?
Outside the Cage
How solid is the case for organic and cage-free egg production?
Between the Lines: Practically Organic
Does the organic farming movement make perfect the enemy of good?
Scene Here: The Kitchen Garden Farm
From Our Readers
Profiles in Survival
Young business owners in retail-rich Northampton get along by getting along.
The Burning Question
Neighbors of a proposed wood-burning plant in Springfield cry foul air