Between the Lines: The Clinton Effect

Even the Democrats ain't Democrats anymore.

Comments (1)
Thursday, September 13, 2012

I never really intended to watch the Democratic National Convention. I generally loathe all the self-congratulatory, aggrandizing nonsense of both parties' outings. Thing is, every time I tuned into the DNC for a minute, someone or other was delivering an impressive speech.

And Bill Clinton? Dude's a diva. He delivered a stemwinder that did everything right. He was folksy, presidential, Arkansan, relaxed, and devastating in his takedown of the GOP platform. Think what you will of Bill, he possesses astounding oratorial powers. He's also clearly identified as having fostered an era of remarkable prosperity.

For a few minutes, I felt a little surge of almost partisan pride as he laid out in stark terms the broad-scale state of affairs: "We Democrats, we think the country works better with a strong middle class, with real opportunities for poor folks to work their way into it, with a relentless focus on the future, with business and government actually working together to promote growth and broadly shared prosperity. You see, we believe that 'We're all in this together' is a far better philosophy than 'You're on your own.'"

Bracing stuff. Here's the rub—I'm not really a Democrat, though I've never once voted Republican. I am, like many people, stuck with the Democrats. Few are the times when I feel a sense of togetherness with a party that's long been a bunch of namy-pamby, hand-wringing incompetents, endlessly playing defense instead of stating their beliefs and sticking to them. To hear Clinton throwing such stout punches and doing so in grand style made me feel good.

That good feeling can be dangerous, delusional. Luckily, before the adrenaline surge dumbed me down, I remembered a few things. The man on stage, whipping up a frenzy of righteous agreement, was central to the transforming of the Democratic Party to said bunch of incompetents. Bright and engaging though he is, I don't like Clinton politically. He is, after all, the guy who led the Democrats into becoming GOP Lite.

And now look—the Republicans are quite, quite mad in their pursuit of a brighter yesterday, and the Democrats are equally deluded. They embrace and defend against Republicans what used to be a Republican healthcare plan. Thankfully, they hold sane positions on social issues, and offer economic policy that consists of more than "Give the rich more and maybe they'll save us." Two out of three wouldn't be bad.

But the creature that Clinton begat, the so-called "centrist Democrat," has become something every bit as dangerous as a Republican in certain important ways. Of the many reasons I despised the Bush administration, two overshadowed the rest: Bush and his cronies oversaw an all-out assault on our sacred civil liberties, and they lowered us as a nation to the same barbarism we were supposedly fighting when they endorsed torture.

When Barack Obama took office, I was relieved. Those things would stop. As far as any of us knows, the torture did stop. All the same, the Obama Department of Justice has protected from prosecution those who are guilty of torturing. And civil liberties? Obama has continued the assault on civil liberties that Bush began, in some cases one-upping the most reprehensible American policies in modern memory.

The true believers at the DNC, teary-eyed and transfixed by Clinton and Obama alike, seemed perfectly willing to dismiss what Obama has done. And what he's done includes asserting the right to assassinate American citizens far from the field of battle (where different rules would, naturally, reign). In at least one known case, that of American Anwar al-Awlaki, Obama really did approve such killing. It's an inconvenience, but a central pillar of Western democracy, that even those clearly guilty of treason must be given due process, even if they have Muslim names. Only tyrants would kill their own people without a trial. At least we used to think so.

With all that in mind, I just couldn't get into all the flag-waving and self-congratulation on view at the DNC. End of the day, I like Barack Obama. I wouldn't dream of pulling the lever for Romney and the other guy. The two-party system is a closed loop that just keeps rolling further and further to the right, and many of us have little choice but to cling to whatever's left of the left. The Democratic glass, it seems, remains stubbornly half empty.

Comments (1)
Post a Comment

What a revelation, the Democrats are not Democrats anymore. I knew that While Lyndon Johnson was president with the expanding Indochina war. Since then it has gotten worse with “bipartisanship,” with the Democrats aping the Republicans, anxious to get along with the enemy of the middle and working classes that put them into office. The recent conventions were mostly entertainment.

But Clinton made a good speech. His speech was better than his performance as presdient. Clinton is the one who pushed for passage of the North America Free Trade Agreement, the beginning of free trade agreements that would cause the massive exportation of jobs from the United States. A Republican could not have done better. Organized labor still votes for him. Thus far exporting jobs is a prerequisite for endorsement by organized labor.

And now we get to James Heflin’s politics. He likes Obama. 4 more years of an expanded war in the Middle East and Central Asia and he still likes Obama? And he complains that the Democratic glass remains stubbornly half empty.

I have what may be a revelation for Heflin. There will be 4 presidential candidates on the ballot in Massachusetts and many other states. There will be Libertarian Gary Johnson and Green Party Candidate Jill Stein, and either one of those two would be better than the candidates of the duopoly.

In addition there will be some legislative races which are important. Elections laws are determined mostly by the legislature.

Heflin could have helped make things better by helping put someone on the ballot in March, instead of waiting for someone else to hand him a candidate of his liking.

Posted by Robert Underwood on 9.13.12 at 16:28



New User/Guest?

Find it Here:
search type:
search in:

« Previous   |   Next »
Print Email RSS feed

Better Later?
More joining the ranks in favor of a later start time for high schools
Between the Lines: Riding the Brand
Martha Coakley and Charlie Baker are more afraid to lose than inspired to win.
More Than A Coal Job
A veteran of the Mount Tom energy plant begins again.
From Our Readers
In Satoshi We Trust?
Outside the Cage
How solid is the case for organic and cage-free egg production?
Between the Lines: Practically Organic
Does the organic farming movement make perfect the enemy of good?
Scene Here: The Kitchen Garden Farm