News

City of Whose Homes?

Activists call for Springfield's rebuilding plan to be more inclusive.

Comments (1)
Thursday, May 31, 2012

In the wake of the freak tornado that devastated large swaths of Springfield last summer, city leaders began to focus on what, for lack of a better phrase, might be called the silver lining: the opportunity not just to rebuild those parts of the city, but to improve them—to, in the words of a resulting redevelopment plan, "bring the city back bigger, better and stronger."

The "Rebuild Springfield" plan, led by a 15-member advisory committee and compiled by an outside firm hired by the group, was released this spring. It was developed after several months of community meetings; in an introductory letter, Mayor Domenic Sarno wrote that the plan was "directly shaped by the more than 2,000 voices of city residents and stakeholders who came out in our public meetings and online forums to share their aspirations, frustrations and vision for how to make the City of Springfield a better place for all of us."

But critics say that not every voice was heard in the process—namely, those of the city's poorest residents. As a result, they say, that vulnerable population is left at even greater risk by the plan, which calls for bringing more market-rate housing to the city but says little about low-income housing. That, they fear, will lead to gentrification at the expense of an already inadequate housing stock for the poor.

"It's like any natural disaster: the poorest get pushed out and don't get to come back," as was the case in post-Katrina New Orleans, said Holly Richardson, of Arise for Social Justice and Out Now. "We're saying: don't exclude their voices."

It's a message she and fellow activists are taking directly to Sarno, holding, to date, three sit-ins outside his office. Specifically, the group is asking the mayor to create a housing task force made up of 50 percent low- and moderate-income people, who historically have been left out of larger discussions about housing and development in the city, said Arise's Michaelann Bewsee.

"There's a lot of people who think they know what [we] need, but they don't talk to us," Bewsee said. She went to several of the Rebuild Springfield forums and gave feedback on its website, she said, "and I don't feel I had any impact at all."

Sarno has, thus far, refused to meet with the activists—who have brought brown-bag lunches and even set up furniture in the hall outside his office—other than to talk briefly with them during their first visit, last month. He also had Gerry McCafferty, the city's housing director, write a three-page letter to Arise outlining the city's work on low-income housing, homelessness and neighborhood revitalization.

The mayor declined comment for this article, although his press aide, Tom Walsh, reiterated what Sarno told the activists at City Hall: that Springfield has taken on more than its fair share of low-income housing, and it's time for neighboring communities to step up. And, Walsh added, the city found suitable housing for all residents who were displaced by the tornado. "The city's definitely been doing a lot to end homelessness and house people," he said.

Bewsee has no problem with other communities being more welcoming to poor people, but that doesn't mean Springfield's poor should have to leave their community, she said. "To say they should go to Wilbraham or East Longmeadow—well, I don't want to live there."

Bewsee also questions whether the plan's goal of bringing more upwardly mobile young professionals to the city is realistic. "I'm not sure that demographic is significant anymore, considering that college graduates are not finding jobs on their fields," she said. "I really believe that if we can find a way for people who already live here to have their housing and job needs met, then it will make us an attractive city and people will be more interested in living here. ... It always goes back to the question: are we building the city for the people who live here, or for the people we want to live here?"

While Bewsee doesn't object to the proposals in the rebuilding plan, she said, she'd like to see it include more ideas for improved low-income housing, such as small-scale developments with communal spaces like courtyards. But first, she said, people like her have to be included in the public conversation—and she and her fellow activists will keep pushing Sarno until they are.

The group plans future visits to the mayor's office and will be a presence at an interfaith service planned for June 1, the anniversary of the tornado. The activists, Bewsee said, will not disrupt the service. "We'll stand outside and say: 'What about us?'"

Comments (1)
Post a Comment

The state and federal government should be helping more with the tornado. The real long term problem is unemployment. Deval Patrick, Obama and the Democratic and Republican parties created the unemployment through outsourcing, free trade agreements, run away immigration, and a refusal to enforce what paltry immigration laws we have. Despite the best efforts of governor Patrick to allow illegal immigrants the most famous illegal immigrant, Obama’s uncle was caught drunk driving, but he is still here, and he has housing while Americans hit by the tornado do not.

The Amanda street area has been mostly rebuilt. Those people had jobs, and insurance. Some are retired with accumulated assets in the form of savings, and pensions. Six Corners does not, so it is not rebuilt. We have been treated to stories about 98% of the insurance claims being settled. That means an absentee landlord go this money. It does not mean the he decided to rebuild the building. After all, would you build a building for unemployed people who may not be able to pay your rent while the banks, insurance companies, and the city want you to pay their fees?

But Bewsee is right, more of the educated are joining the ranks of the unemployed. There is not much the city can do about it. Sarno is right, Springfield does more than its share in funding for the poor. But what Sarno will not do is blame his Republicrat buddies in state and national government for the problem. For that matter even the so-called reform groups around town go light on blaming the Republicrats. They may march around outside their office and generate publicity for both parties, but they will not tell the voters to give them the boot.

No one want to move. But there are some 5 story buildings with many units which were destroyed. They cannot be replaced. The city would not allow a building like that for families today, they had been grandfathered in. One of those buildings may be replaced by a couple of two family units. The rest have got to move.

But the real cause of the problem is the created poverty caused by the Republicrats with their free trade agreements, outsourcing and run away illegal immigration. Without that many of the tornado victims would have the resources to help themselves, reducing those that need long term help to a more manageable number.

Robert Underwood

Www.electbobunderwood.org

Posted by Robert Underwood on 5.31.12 at 17:31
Comment:

Name:

Password:

New User/Guest?

Find it Here:
keyword:
search type:
search in:

« Previous   |   Next »
Print Email RSS feed

From Our Readers
Baker: More of the Same; Props to Rohmann; Props to Rohmann
Between the Lines: A Gun Owner’s Resentment
Why make it expensive and difficult for law-abiding residents to possess firearms?
Sorry, Nixon
If the impeachment of our 37th president showed that the system works, what does Obama’s continued political survival say about it?
The Zipcar Is Here
Car sharing takes hold in the Valley.
Under the Microscope
Did ex-WSU president Evan Dobelle use university resources to support an identity as well as a lifestyle?
From Our Readers
Casino Opposition “Selfish”; Cut Foreign Aid, Not Our Military
Between the Lines: Deval’s Capital Management
He can rehab his office, but what about his legacy?
From Snowden to the Pentagon Papers
Can student interest in civics be rekindled?