Brown Agrees to Meet With NAACP After All

Comments (1)
Thursday, February 09, 2012
U.S. Sen. Scott Brown has found time to meet with NAACP members in Springfield.

After initially declining an invitation, Sen. Scott Brown has apparently decided he can find some time to meet with the Springfield NAACP branch.

In December, the branch invited Massachusetts' junior senator to meet with members at a "town hall" meeting sometime early in 2012. In reply, a scheduler in Brown's Boston office sent an email to the Rev. Talbert Swan II, the branch president, thanking him for his "kind invitation" but turning it down.

"As you might imagine, there are extraordinary demands on the senator's time and we do our best to accommodate worthwhile requests such as yours," wrote staffer Maria M. Coakley. "Unfortunately, due to the schedule of the U.S. Senate, the unpredictability of Senate business and the high volume of requests he receives, we must unfortunately decline."

The note ended: "We appreciate your understanding."

But Swan, in fact, was not especially understanding, as he pointed out in a letter he wrote back to the senator's office. "While I understand the demands of your extremely busy schedule, I remind you that you serve a very diverse constituency across the Commonwealth, including members of the NAACP," Swan wrote. "It is no secret that you are in the midst of a tough reelection campaign and will be spending quite a bit of time in the Commonwealth in the months to come. It is inconceivable that you cannot find any time during the course of this entire election season to meet with our members in Springfield, which is part of the Commonwealth, which you represent."

Swan ended the letter asking Brown to "reconsider" his earlier decision, noting, "To summarily dismiss our desire to meet with our senator is quite concerning."

Within a day of Swan's sending the letter—which, not incidentally, he also sent to the local media—Brown's office had changed its position. Last week, Swan told the Advocate that Brown has committed to a March 19 meeting with the NAACP branch. In addition, some of Brown's staffers will come to Springfield to meet with Swan on Feb. 16.

Swan said he's not exactly sure why the senator's staff requested the private meeting in February, prior to the branch meeting. "I'm happy to sit down with them and tell them what our concerns are, and flesh out what the senator's agenda is," he said. "We're fine with it either way—one meeting, two meetings, three meetings, whatever."

According to Swan, Brown's office told him that the branch's initial request had been turned down as the result of a "misunderstanding" about the scope of the meeting; a town hall-style meeting, Swan was told, requires more time to plan than the senator had time for.

"It was basically a bogus excuse," Swan said with a laugh. "The reality was, [they] saw 'NAACP' and decided, 'We're going to blow it off.'"

And as for Brown's opponent in that "tough reelection campaign" Swan referred to? Swan said he spoke to presumed Democratic nominee Elizabeth Warren during her visit to Springfield last week and asked her, too, to meet with the NAACP—an invitation Warren readily accepted. The date of that meeting has yet to be set.


Comments (1)
Post a Comment

The people at the NAACP need to understand that they are not the only ones represented in MASS. He DOES have many obligations that were already set before your crybaby letter. So in turn, those people have to cancel out so that you crybabies can get you time with him. Remember this, you are not gods, you are not elected to represent me,and if you dont want a backlash someday, stop your racial crybaby acts. I believe in what NAACP stands, but not the part where you rough shod over other voters and your racial attitude; we come first act. You dont come first!!!!!!! Everybody in this great State has a right to see their elected officails, not just your outfit. Remember this; what ever color, gender,religion,culture,disability, NO ONE IS BETTER THAN ANYBODY ELSE!!!!!! This includes you. You ought to be ashamed of yourselves after the Senator moved/canceled with other voters/obligations so he could meet with you after your CRYBABY LETTER. And that is exactly what it is, A CRYBABY LETTER THAT YOU BETTER SEE US OR????????

Posted by Robert Cerveny, Jr. on 2.8.12 at 9:11



New User/Guest?

Find it Here:
search type:
search in:

« Previous   |   Next »
Print Email RSS feed

From Our Readers
Baker: More of the Same; Props to Rohmann; Props to Rohmann
Between the Lines: A Gun Owner’s Resentment
Why make it expensive and difficult for law-abiding residents to possess firearms?
Sorry, Nixon
If the impeachment of our 37th president showed that the system works, what does Obama’s continued political survival say about it?
The Zipcar Is Here
Car sharing takes hold in the Valley.
Under the Microscope
Did ex-WSU president Evan Dobelle use university resources to support an identity as well as a lifestyle?
From Our Readers
Casino Opposition “Selfish”; Cut Foreign Aid, Not Our Military
Between the Lines: Deval’s Capital Management
He can rehab his office, but what about his legacy?
From Snowden to the Pentagon Papers
Can student interest in civics be rekindled?