Imperium Watch: Money, Trapped at the Top

A jobless recovery is no recovery for the U.S. economy.

Comments (3)
Thursday, September 17, 2009

A recovery that may soon show the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on the upswing without a commensurate increase in new jobs: how is that possible?

Tight credit is partly responsible, but so is the fact that the top layers of the economy are soaking up the money, not letting it flow down to workers at other levels. In 1980, according to researchers at the Institute for Policy Studies, the average Fortune 500 executive made 42 times as much as the average worker. Now he makes 319 times as much. The effects of the economy's failure to create jobs spread out into foreclosure, bankruptcy, low consumption creating cycles of job loss, and inability to afford health insurance.

High compensation and the current disconnect between performance and remuneration—astronomical salaries and benefits paid to executives who manage their companies poorly—protect people at the highest-paid levels from the disasters their workers must cope with. In a new report, "America's Bailout Barons," ISP researchers point out, "At 10 of the financial firms that are among the top recipients of bailout money, executives were awarded stock options early this year when the market was at the bottom. Now that taxpayer support has helped lift the price of their stock, the executives who brought the global economy to the brink of disaster have seen their portfolios increase in value by $90 million."

While federal laws to cap executive pay would likely never go down well with the American public, there are other ways of approaching this problem. Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) has proposed legislation (H.R. 1874) that would give companies tax breaks and preference for government contracts if they meet several eligibility guidelines, one being that they may not pay their top executives more than 100 times as much as the wages of their lowest-paid workers (still a very high ratio). And, to ensure that they're doing their part to create and save jobs, they must "produce at least 90 percent of their goods and services" in the United States, and carry on at least 50 percent of their research and development here."

Comments (3)
Post a Comment
Wouldn't things be better if we were just all socialists? Stephanie Kraft would have you think so. Everyone animal would be equal, but some animals are more equal then others, especially the ones that jump through governemnt hoops to earn cozy favors and tax breaks. If thats not the "fascism" these people decry, I dont know what is.
Posted by Roger on 9.20.09 at 18:05
Whilst we don't want all out socialism, you have to admit we need to have a steady hand controlling the bonus culture, to ensure there isnt a next time!
Posted by care home steve on 9.25.09 at 8:53
Hey, these are the best and the brightest. They deserve all that they can steel. After all this ia capitalism.
Posted by Stan on 9.28.09 at 13:55



New User/Guest?

Find it Here:
search type:
search in:

« Previous   |   Next »
Print Email RSS feed

From Our Readers
Baker: More of the Same; Props to Rohmann; Props to Rohmann
Between the Lines: A Gun Owner’s Resentment
Why make it expensive and difficult for law-abiding residents to possess firearms?
Sorry, Nixon
If the impeachment of our 37th president showed that the system works, what does Obama’s continued political survival say about it?
The Zipcar Is Here
Car sharing takes hold in the Valley.
Under the Microscope
Did ex-WSU president Evan Dobelle use university resources to support an identity as well as a lifestyle?
From Our Readers
Casino Opposition “Selfish”; Cut Foreign Aid, Not Our Military
Between the Lines: Deval’s Capital Management
He can rehab his office, but what about his legacy?
From Snowden to the Pentagon Papers
Can student interest in civics be rekindled?