Imperium Watch: Money, Trapped at the Top

A jobless recovery is no recovery for the U.S. economy.

Comments (3)
Thursday, September 17, 2009

A recovery that may soon show the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on the upswing without a commensurate increase in new jobs: how is that possible?

Tight credit is partly responsible, but so is the fact that the top layers of the economy are soaking up the money, not letting it flow down to workers at other levels. In 1980, according to researchers at the Institute for Policy Studies, the average Fortune 500 executive made 42 times as much as the average worker. Now he makes 319 times as much. The effects of the economy's failure to create jobs spread out into foreclosure, bankruptcy, low consumption creating cycles of job loss, and inability to afford health insurance.

High compensation and the current disconnect between performance and remuneration—astronomical salaries and benefits paid to executives who manage their companies poorly—protect people at the highest-paid levels from the disasters their workers must cope with. In a new report, "America's Bailout Barons," ISP researchers point out, "At 10 of the financial firms that are among the top recipients of bailout money, executives were awarded stock options early this year when the market was at the bottom. Now that taxpayer support has helped lift the price of their stock, the executives who brought the global economy to the brink of disaster have seen their portfolios increase in value by $90 million."

While federal laws to cap executive pay would likely never go down well with the American public, there are other ways of approaching this problem. Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) has proposed legislation (H.R. 1874) that would give companies tax breaks and preference for government contracts if they meet several eligibility guidelines, one being that they may not pay their top executives more than 100 times as much as the wages of their lowest-paid workers (still a very high ratio). And, to ensure that they're doing their part to create and save jobs, they must "produce at least 90 percent of their goods and services" in the United States, and carry on at least 50 percent of their research and development here."

Comments (3)
Post a Comment
Wouldn't things be better if we were just all socialists? Stephanie Kraft would have you think so. Everyone animal would be equal, but some animals are more equal then others, especially the ones that jump through governemnt hoops to earn cozy favors and tax breaks. If thats not the "fascism" these people decry, I dont know what is.
Posted by Roger on 9.20.09 at 18:05
Whilst we don't want all out socialism, you have to admit we need to have a steady hand controlling the bonus culture, to ensure there isnt a next time!
Posted by care home steve on 9.25.09 at 8:53
Hey, these are the best and the brightest. They deserve all that they can steel. After all this ia capitalism.
Posted by Stan on 9.28.09 at 13:55



New User/Guest?

Find it Here:
search type:
search in:

« Previous   |   Next »
Print Email RSS feed

Fighting for the Dunbar Center
Will this beloved institution in Springfield’s Mason Square survive?
From Our Readers
A Republican to the Rescue?
Charlie Baker isn’t exactly an outsider, but in a one-party state, he sure looks like one.
Immigrant Children in Chicopee?
Immigration has a very young face these days. We may be seeing that face at Westover.
From Our Readers
Casino Won’t Bring Back Vital, Diverse City; Still Time to Reject Casinos?
Between the Lines: The Belchertown of the Future
A solar village at the former Belchertown State School: it may be change long overdue.
Stagestruck: Expecting the Unexpected
The adventurous theater of Ko Fest
From Our Readers
Casinos: A Many-Sided Issue; Pipeline Clarification